Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Oropeza

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1976No. 11542Published

1DissentShepard, Justice

This case involves trafficking in heroin. Appellants were arrested, tried and convicted of the crime of possession of heroin and although the majority remands the cause for further proceedings, it has effectively prevented further proceedings by requiring suppression of the heroin.

I would hold that exigent circumstances validated the search pursuant to an arrest. Federal, state and local law enforcement officers had conducted surveillance of the premises in question here; had made a purchase of a substance known to have been acquired from the premises in question here; analysis had indicated…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API