Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grimaldi v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1974No. 6982Published

1Dissent

*89Thompson, C. J., with whom Mowbray, J., agrees,

dissenting:

The failure of the trial court to allow the jury to decide whether the defendant’s confessions were freely and voluntarily given should be deemed prejudicial error. Indeed, every jurisdiction which follows the Massachusetts Rule in the handling of confessions holds that the failure to instruct the jury that it must decide whether the confessions were voluntary, and to disregard them if it determined that they were not voluntarily given, is reversible error. State v. Pulliam, 349 P.2d 781 (Ariz. 1960); United States v. Inman, 352 F.2d…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API