United States v. Lee
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
This was a suit against the defendant, who was commissioner of claims under the Act of Congress of the 9th of April, 1816, § 11, [3 Stat. at Large, 261.] offered two accounts settled and certified by the proper officers of the treasury department, according to the act of 3d of March, 1797. objected, because, as he contended, the defendant was not a receiver of public money within the meaning of that act.
1Opinion of the Court
The CouRT
said they had decided in the ease of the United *463Stales v. Benjamin King, at October term, 1822, (not reported,) that accounts, so certified, were evidence where the defendant was charged with money advanced to him by the United States, for which he was to account. In that case money had been advanced to King upon a contract for gun-locks.
The present defendant was commissioner of claims and received money in advance for the contingencies of his office, for' which he is called upon to account. .
2Cited by1 opinion
- Bechtel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880