Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. . N.Y. Cent. and Hud. R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There was evidence in the case tending to prove that before the plaintiff was put off the train at West Albany, he offered to pay to the conductor the additional four cents which he demanded, and that other passengers offered to pay the amount in his behalf. There was no error in the submission of this question to the jury, and they appear to have found the fact in favor of the plaintiff. If the stoppage at West Albany had been made for the sole purpose of putting the plaintiff off, and he had rendered it necessary by a fractious refusal to pay the extra fare, he would not have been entitled…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. Memphis & Charleston R.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1882
  2. Pease v. . D., L. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RineyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Pease v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Behr v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API