Gathany v. Bishopp
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing a suit for an injunction on two grounds: (1) that the court did not have jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed, and (2) that it had not acquired jurisdiction over the defendants by proper service of process. We think that the dismissal was unquestionably correct whichever of the grounds given be looked to as the basis of the decision.
The facts are that one Risser was adjudged bankrupt by the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina in the year 1934 and was duly granted a discharge. Among the claims…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Babbitt v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Helms v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hogue v. Milodon Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- California State Board of Equalization v. Coast Radio ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- In Re BellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1962
- Young Properties Corp. v. United Equity Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1975
- In Re HogueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.