Legal Opinion
Kerby v. Ruegamer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal, by the plaintiff, William Kerby, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New. York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the defendants, entered on the 15th day of March, 1904.
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, J.:
This action is brought upon the following instrument:
“ Dolls. 166 51/100 Brooklyn, Aug. 13th, 1903.
“ Three months after date we promise to pay to the order of Wm. Kerby one hundred & sixty-six 51/100 Dollars at The Union Bank, value received & interest.
“ANDREW RUEGAMER, Jr.}
“ DANIEL W. MOORE, } as Trustees, etc.”
“ LEON RAUNHEIM. }
The plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants individually. This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendants upon the merits, rendered by the trial justice. The note sued upon is a renewal of a three months’ note for $164 and interest, given…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- First National Bank of Brooklyn v. WallisNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coal River Collieries v. Eureka Coal & Wood Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- McFarland v. ShawTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- American Trust Co. v. CanevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
- Charles Nelson Co. v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Taylor v. FluhartyIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.