State v. Sheldon
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
A Maryland statute requires those who wish to burn crosses or other religious symbols to do two things: (1) secure the permission of the property owner where the burning is to occur and (2) notify the local fire department before engaging in the burning. The issue in this case is whether Maryland’s “cross burning” law is constitutional.
I
On October 17, 1991, Brandon Forrest Sheldon ignited a cross on the property of Harry Smith and his family, who are black. Sheldon had not obtained permission to burn the cross on Smith’s Prince George’s County premises, nor had he notified…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Curran v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Black v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Piscatelli v. Board of Liquor License CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Pack Shack, Inc. v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.