Legal Opinion

3-H Securities Co. v. Kibby

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1933No. Docket No. 4761Published

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

Three separate petitions for writs of mandate were consolidated for trial in the court below, and have also been consolidated for the purposes of appeal. The writs were granted by the court, hence these appeals. The following statement of facts is sufficient for an understanding of the questions presented for decision.

The San Joaquin River Water Storage District, hereinafter referred to as the district, was organized November 2'6, 1923, under the California Water Storage District Act, approved June 3, 1921 (Deering’s General Laws, 1931, vol. 3, p. 5103). On March 4,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doe Run Lead Co. v. MaynardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. Miller & Lux Inc. v. J. G. James Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Phillips v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Muller v. CareyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API