Legal Opinion

United States v. Lavon R. Kent

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1990No. 88-1088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Lavon R. Kent, a Karuk Indian, appeals her conviction after a bench trial for unauthorized residential occupancy of national forest system land. Kent contends that the district court erred in holding that she had no individual aboriginal rights to occupy the land in question. She also contends, for the first time on appeal, (1) that she was entitled to occupy the land because the Department of the Interior had issued her a certificate of eligibility for an allotment in a national forest and because the relevant statute contemplated that an Indian would occupy the land…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Lavon R. KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. OsguthorpeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1998
  3. United States v. Lavon R. KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Lavon R. KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API