Legal Opinion

Webb v. J. R. Lowe & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1927No. 7 Div. 629PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomebville, J.

It is a complete defense to an action on a promissory note that one or more of the items entering into the consideration of the note were based upon sales or other transactions in violation of law. Wadsworth v. Dunnam, 117 Ala. 661, 668, 23 So. 699. And the doctrine has been feeog-nized in this state that a demand based upon an account stated “is essentially the same as if a promissory note had been given for the balance,” and that “the recovery is upon the assent to the balance, and the subsequent agreement to pay that balance, as if upon a promissory note.” Loventhal v. Morris, 103 Ala.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. DunnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Loventhal & Son v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Pacific Guano Co. v. MullenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Leverett v. Garland Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Reed v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holcombe v. Georgia Milk Producers ConfederationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Gilbert v. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Penney Binford v. Hudson Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API