Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Costello
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 20, 2001No. 01-2019PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
AFTER ARGUMENT AND UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Petitioner-Appellant Jonathan Crawford appeals a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Jack B. Weinstein, Judge) denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because we conclude that Crawford’s petition is barred by the statute of limitations imposed by the Anti Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), we affirm the judgment of the District…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alixcair Valverde v. James Stinson, Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Fac.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Hanifi Jihad v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Anthony Ross v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Phillips v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
- Reed v. ReardonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019