Legal Opinion
Brodsky v. Zagata
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph C. Teresi, J.
Petitioners in this combined CPLR article 78 and declaratory judgment action seek an order granting the following *176relief: (a) Temporarily restraining the operation of the October 5th rule; (b) Preliminarily enjoining the operation of the October 5th rule until a decision on the merits is rendered; (c) Declaring invalid and null and void the October 5th rule; (d) Permanently enjoining respondents from adopting a rule identical or similar to the rules of March 28th, June 28th, and October 5th without new supporting evidence and without leave of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York State Ass'n of Counties v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Consolation Nursing Home, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bates v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Matter of Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. v. Dep't of Health of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- New York State Health Facilities Ass'n v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Law Enforcement Officers Union v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Brodsky v. ZagataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996