Legal Opinion

Paramount National Life Insurance Co. v. Raupe

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1984No. 2-84-062-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILL, Justice.

Paramount National Life Insurance Company appeals from a judgment in favor of Hugh Morris Raupe, its insured under a health insurance contract, for damages which Raupe received while riding a bicycle. Paramount urges that Raupe is pre-*753eluded from recovering under the policy because accidents while riding or operating a two-wheeled vehicle were excluded from coverage by the provisions of the policy.

We reverse and render, because we find that a bicycle is a two-wheeled vehicle within the meaning of the policy.

In point of error number one, Paramount complains of the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Prudential Ins. Co. of Great Britain v. Associated Employers LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. Van GilderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. American General Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Western Insurance Companies v. AndrusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API