Legal Opinion
In re Mancillas
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 2016No. H042652PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
When a defendant “has been released on probation” with execution of sentence suspended, and the court is subsequently properly notified that the defendant is “confined in prison,” Penal Code section 1203.2a 1 mandates that “the court shall issue its commitment” and “shall be deprived of jurisdiction over defendant if it does not issue its commitment or make other final order terminating its jurisdiction over defendant in the case within 60 days after being notified of the confinement.”
In this case, petitioner Moisés Mancillas was placed on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Flores CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021