Legal Opinion

Grant v. Winik

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 10-2204PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION. 484

II. FACTS. 485

490 III. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS.

490 A. Summary Judgment Standard.

490 B. Determining Genuine Disputes of Material Fact.

492 C. Plaintiffs Alleged Genuine Disputes of Material Fact.

492 1. Contested Facts as to Baier.

493 2. Contested Facts as to Baran and Winik.

498 IV. SECTION 1983 CLAMS AGANST WINIK, BARAN, AND BAER ..

498 A. Plaintiffs Unlawful Search and Excessive Force Claims.

501 1. Warrantless Entry of Pagano’s Apartment.

504 2. Baran’s Use of Pepper Spray.

505 3. Winik’s Use of Deadly Force.

507 B. Remaining…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. King v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. State of Maine v. Gabriel R. McKusickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  3. Dr. Page Carol Woods and Dr. Nathanial Woods, Jr., individually and o/b/o N.W., a minor v. Williamsport Area School District, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. Eberhardinger v. City of YorkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. LUNA-DIAZ v. HACKENSACK POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API