Legal Opinion

McKeen v. James

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1894No. 93Published

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. In the Court of Civil Appeals, James, Chief Justice, did not sit.

1Opinion

The plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, sought to recover the land in controversy in an ordinary action of trespass to try title. They claim under a deed absolute upon its face, which the defendants, who claimed under a conveyance from the grantor's assignee in bankruptcy, alleged to have been only a mortgage. The plaintiffs, in a supplemental petition, prayed, that in the event the court should be of opinion that the deed was intended only as a mortgage, that they have judgment for the debt, and a decree foreclosing the mortgage for its payment. To this the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mann v. FalconTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Cason v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Boggess v. BrownsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API