State v. Harding

WAGNE1~, J;-

-The abstract contains the evidence of only one witness, the same not being necessary for the propositions which the appellant presents for our determination.

It is the contention of the appellant that the court erred in overruling his challenge for cause to one of the jurors. The defendant exhausted all of his peremptory challenges, using one of the same upon the juror as to whom he claims his challenge for cause should ha~ve been sus-tamed. The juror, upon her voir cZ'ire examina~ tion, answered, in ~ubstance, that she had read about the case, but did not remember reading any…