Legal Opinion

Tiffany Construction Co. v. Bureau of Revenue

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1976No. 2683PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Taxpayer is an Arizona Corporation, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, involved in road building activities. The work performed, which involves the instant penalty assessment, was done on the Navajo Reservation within the boundaries of New Mexico. For all practical purposes this was the first road job taxpayer had done in New Mexico.

On appeal taxpayer’s sole issue is whether it is subject to a penalty assessment. Section 72-13-82(A), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 10, pt. 2, 1961, Supp.1975). That section states in part:

“A. In the case of failure, due to negligence or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. G. M. Shupe, Inc. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Co-Con, Inc. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Gathings v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kewanee Industries, Inc. v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Tiffany Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Grogan v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. El Centro Villa Nursing Center v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. C & D Trailer Sales v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API