Tiffany Construction Co. v. Bureau of Revenue
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Taxpayer is an Arizona Corporation, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, involved in road building activities. The work performed, which involves the instant penalty assessment, was done on the Navajo Reservation within the boundaries of New Mexico. For all practical purposes this was the first road job taxpayer had done in New Mexico.
On appeal taxpayer’s sole issue is whether it is subject to a penalty assessment. Section 72-13-82(A), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 10, pt. 2, 1961, Supp.1975). That section states in part:
“A. In the case of failure, due to negligence or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- G. M. Shupe, Inc. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Co-Con, Inc. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Gathings v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kewanee Industries, Inc. v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Tiffany Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Grogan v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- El Centro Villa Nursing Center v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- C & D Trailer Sales v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.