Legal Opinion

Burks v. Apfel

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 20, 2000No. 99-1532Published

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner of Social Security appeals the district court’s order reversing the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ), finding that plaintiff Vergie Burks was not entitled to Social Security widow’s insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434. 1 Contrary to the ALJ, the district court found Vergie to be the putative spouse of the deceased Wesley Burks under California law, and therefore eligible to receive widow’s benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.

I.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Pioneer Uravan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Estate of KroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API