Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Branson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2002No. 99-AA-115Published

1ConcurrenceSchwelb, Associate Judge

I concur in the judgment and join the court’s opinion. I write separately, however, to add a few words about the nature and significance of the issue that the agency must decide on remand.

At first blush, one might conclude that, in the context of this case, there is little difference between “unsafe working conditions” (ie., “smoking is dangerous to everyone’s health, including mine”) and “medical reasons” (ie., “smoking can make me ill”). But as the court points out, the agency’s rejection, based on a credibility determination, of Ms. Branson’s medical grounds does not deal with the much…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ruckstuhl v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Shimp v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Lapham v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API