Irwin v. Hanthorn
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal No. 14, Nov. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., January Term, 1895, No. 22, for defendant upon sci. fa. sur mortgage. Sci. fa. sur mortgage. Before Hemphill, J., on which verdict was rendered for the defendant, the plea being payment. Material facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal No. 14, Nov. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., January Term, 1895, No. 22, for defendant upon sci. fa. sur mortgage. Sci. fa. sur mortgage. Before Hemphill, J., on which verdict was rendered for the defendant, the plea being payment. Material facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the Superior Court. Errors assigned were, (1) in ruling that the plaintiff was not entitled to ask the following question of Thomas W. Pierce, a witness for the defendant, said question being in cross-examination : Q. Did you know of the existence of a paper writing purporting…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beayer, J.,
Three specifications of error confront us in this case. Two of them are not referred to by the appellant in his argument and it is to be presumed, therefore, that they were abandoned. They related to the admission of evidence introduced by the plaintiff below and objected to by the defendant. The objections were sustained in both cases upon grounds which are clearly apparent, although in the first ease no particular ground of objection appears upon the record. The offer contained in the first specification of error was very properly rejected for the reason that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Com. ex rel. Hoopes v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Cawley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irwin v. HanthornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Commonwealth v. SchmohlCumberland County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1954
- McCune EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Beaver County · 1950