Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walden Leasing, Inc. v. Beiswenger, Hoch & Associates, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 1995No. 94-2009Published

1DissentGunther, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent.

It appears from the record that an issue of genuine fact exists regarding whether the defect in the construction of the roadway was patent or latent. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America filed the affidavit of a civil engineer with a specialty in traffic engineering in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. The expert opined that “[T]he defects in the design of the ramp may not have been apparent at the time that the ramp was accepted by the State of Florida, Department of Transportation.”

As this court noted in Tretten v. Irrgang, 654 So.2d 1297 (Fla.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hervey v. AlfonsoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Tretten v. IrrgangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API