Lucero v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CRISWELL.
Manual Lucero, claimant, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which disqualified him from receipt of benefits pursuant to § 8-73-108(5)(e)(VIII), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 3B). We set aside the order and remand for reconsideration thereof.
From a deputy’s adverse determination of his claim for unemployment benefits, claimant appealed to a hearing officer. Such an appeal is governed by § 8-74-103(1), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B), which requires the hearing officer to afford “all interested parties a fair hearing.” During the course of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. Industrial Commission of the StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- City of Arvada v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Colorado Division of Employment & Training v. HewlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Centennial Drywall Co. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Casper Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Commission of the Department of EmploymentWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Ward v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- City & County of Denver v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Safeway Stores 44 Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Casper Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Commission of the Department of EmploymentWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.