Legal Opinion

David Armstrong v. Kristi Kaplon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2017No. 15-56475UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant David Armstrong appeals from the district court’s order affirming a final order of the bankruptcy court, which held that a criminal restitution order imposed against Armstrong was nondis-chargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Section 523(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code states that a debtor may not discharge any debt “to the extent such debt is for a fine, penalty, or forfeiture payable to and for the benefit of a governmental unit, and is not compensation for actual pecuniary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. In Re Ted R. Levy, Debtor. Wilson S. Palmer v. Ted R. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Zamora (In Re Silverman)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. In Re: Timothy L. Taggart, Debtor. The State Bar of California v. Timothy L. TaggartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Warfel v. City of Saratoga (In Re Warfel)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re: Lenore L. Albert-SheridanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. In re: Ryan S. O'HaraUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Ryan O'Hara v. United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API