Legal Opinion

Hess v. Cedarhome Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1926No. 19712. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The Cedarhome Lumber Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Washington. It was originally incorporated with a capital stock of $75,000, divided into 750 shares of the par value of $100 each. Of these shares, the appellant, F„ H. Hess, subscribed for 562% shares, and the defendant George A. Bell for 187% shares. At the time of the organization of the corporation, Hess paid on his stock subscription $15,000, and 75 of the shares were issued to him and 75 to his wife, J. E. Hess. Bell at the same time paid on his subscription $5,000, and 50 shares were issued to him.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. McDonald v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Wilson v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Beach v. President of the Fulton BankCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  5. Madison, Watertown & Milwaukee Plank Road Co. v. Watertown & Portland Plank Road Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. Murdock Realty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Simpers v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Hay v. Big Bend Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Widett v. Pilgrim Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. First National Bank v. Tri-State Equipment & Repair Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API