Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1926No. 25318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This action is one brought in the district court for Dodge county wherein the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was charged with receiving stolen chickens *78in the first count, of which he was found not guilty .by the jury; and charged in the second count, so far as necessary for our consideration, as follows: “That Harold Bailey, at and within'the county of Dodge and state of Nebraska, on or about the 2d day of December, 1925, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully and feloniously conceal certain chickens, to wit, 6 Ancona hens, of the value of $5, 18 White…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Driskill v. ParrishU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1845

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State v. OltjenbrunsNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Whitehead v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API