Woods v. Cicierski

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Joseph Cicierski (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court Order denying his exceptions to the Master’s report in a *1104divorce action as well as his petition for the trial court to allow him to appeal from the Master’s 2003 report nunc pro tunc. In support of his appeal, Husband argues that the trial court erred in failing to find evidence of fraud which would require the court to overturn the Master’s September 2003 Report or allow him to appeal nunc pro tunc. After review, we find that none of Husband’s allegations of error require reversal. Consequently, we affirm the…