Legal Opinion

Mrotek v. City of Boynton Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 17, 1992No. 91-2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm that part of the trial court’s order dismissing the complaint for appellants’ failure to exhaust their administrative remedies. It was, however, error to determine that the dismissal is with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The issue before the trial court is not jurisdictional but involves a judicial policy to defer to the administrative process by requiring appellants to pursue available and adequate remedies. Therefore, the dismissal should have been without prejudice.

Prior to proceeding in the circuit court, the Mroteks must appeal the decision of the city’s building…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. BrockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. St. Joe Paper Co. v. FLA. DEPT OF NATURAL RES.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. SKAGGS-ALBERTSON's P. v. MICHELS BELLEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Bruce v. City of Deerfield BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown, Edwards, Toale Funeral Home, Inc. v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API