Legal Opinion

Grice v. Holk

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1959No. 1 Div. 779Published

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

Charles D. Grice (appellant) filed this action against Arthur A. Hoik and Baldwin Mutual Insurance Company, a corporation (appellees), for damages for libel. The complaint consists of one count which was amended several times. The court sustained the demurrer to the count as originally framed and to the count as subsequently amended, including the count as last amended. The appellant suffered a nonsuit and has appealed.

Error is assigned to the action of the court in sustaining the demurrer to the count as last amended.

In the appellant’s complaint as last amended the letter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGraw v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Meadors v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Age-Herald Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Myers v. Mobile Press-Register, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API