Legal Opinion
California v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1999No. 98-70622PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The California Department of Social Services (“CDSS”) seeks review of a decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) disapproving CDSS’s amendment to its AFDC Foster Care Program State Plan. The Foster Care Program, set forth in Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 670 et séq., provides federal matching funds for states that operate foster care plans in compliance with the Act’s provisions. CDSS amended its plan to comply with a state court decision interpreting 42 U.S.C. § 672(a). See Capitola Land v. Anderson, 55 Cal.App.4th 69, 63 Cal.Rptr.2d 717…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parola v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Capitola Land v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of California Department of Social Services v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- California Department of Social Services v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- California, Department of Social Services v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2000
- 60 soc.sec.rep.ser. 1, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 912, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1149 State of California Department of Social Services v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999