Legal Opinion

Pickford v. Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

This is an appeal from the Order of the Pennsylvania Utility Commission (Commission) which dismissed complaints filed by Susan Piekford (Pickford) and 18 other customers (hereinafter collectively “Petitioners”) of the Pennsylvania American Water Company (PAWC) on the grounds that Petitioners failed to establish a prima facie violation of Section 1501 of the Public Utility Code (Code), 66 Pa.C.S. § 1501.

PAWC’s Change From Chlorinated Water (treated with chlorine) to Chlorami-nated Water (treated with chlorine and ammonia)

In 2003, PAWC announced that it intended to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. HaagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Hughes v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Borough of Gettysburg v. Teamsters Local No. 776Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. County of Lancaster, PA v. AFSCME District Council 89Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  3. M.H. Kichline v. Sunoco Pipeline, L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Red Lion Municipal Auth. v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. TALBERT v. AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API