Legal Opinion

Russell v. Hubbard

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to plea. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Allen, J.

This is an action for assault and-battery and false imprisonment, in which the defendant justifies by plea, as a constable under a warrant of commitment, issued by a justice of the peace of the county of Oneida, upon a conviction of the plaintiff for the offense of petit larceny. The *655defendant, in his plea, has set out the warrant in hcec verba. It is not directed to any officer, or class of officers, or to any other-person ; and the plaintiff has demurred to the plea ; assigning the want of a direction in the warrant as one of the causes of demurrer.

The statute (2 R.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Bradstreet v. FurgesonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
  3. Mead v. GaleNew York Supreme Court · 1845

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re PercyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1868
  2. People ex rel. Cohen v. Warden of Third District PrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. People v. HolcombNew York Supreme Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API