Legal Opinion

Kelmenson v. British America Assurance Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1933No. 7599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge :

This is an action to recover insurance on wool consumed or damaged by fire. The plaintiff obtained a judgment for $4,000.00, the full amount of the policy, and the defendant was allowed a writ of error.

The defendant introduced no evidence, and does not controvert plaintiff’s loss of a quantity of wool by fire. The major defense is that the inventory made and the books kept by plaintiff do not comply with the “iron safe clause” of the policy. That clause is the conventional one requiring “a complete itemized inventory of stock on hand”; and that the insured will keep a set of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Homestead Fire Insurance v. IsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  3. Ruffner Bros. v. Dutchess InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Western Assur. Co. v. ReddingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1895
  5. Prudential Fire Insurance Co. v. AlleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. Franklin Nat. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  2. Dickerson v. Great American InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API