Martin v. Sprague
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Cross appeals from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried by Young, J., without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This action, being at issue upon the complaint and answer, was submitted to the court below for judgment upon an *54agreed statement of the facts. The facts are as follows: In January, 1879, James L. Sprague was the owner of lots 11 and 12, in block 4, of Highland Park addition to Minneapolis. Upon lot 12 was a dwelling-house, in which Sprague and his wife, Angeline M., then and ever since resided, and that lot constituted his homestead under ihe laws of this state. It is of the value of $2,000. Lot 11 is unimproved, and is of the value of $400. In January, 1879, Sprague and his wife mortgaged…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Tinkcom v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Fowler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Willis v. JelineckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by14 opinions
- Walker v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- O'Brien v. KrenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Rambeck v. La BreeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Central State Bank v. LordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Curtis v. CutlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.