Legal Opinion

Essick v. Union Pacific Railroad

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1960No. Civ. No. 24145PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is ail appeal by plaintiffs from an adverse judgment in favor of defendant, in actions for personal injuries and wrongful death.

The plaintiffs’ sole grounds for appeal are alleged error committed by the trial court in the giving of certain instructions and the refusal to give others. It is axiomatic that no judgment may be set aside and no new trial may be ordered on the ground of erroneous instructions unless ‘‘ after an examination of the entire cause, including the evidence, the court shall be of the opinion that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.” (Cal.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bridgman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Taha v. FinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carter v. National Railroad PassengerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Martindale v. City of Mountain ViewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Hutchinson v. Revlon Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Klein v. Southern Pac. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Klein v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API