Legal Opinion
Gumport v. AT & T Technologies, Inc. (In re Transcon Lines)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1996No. Nos. 94-55668, 94-55673, 94-55674, 94-56008, 94-56009, 94-56026 and 94-56027PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
In this bankruptcy proceeding, we must decide whether, under the Interstate Commerce Act, a motor carrier transported shipments as a contract carrier or as a common carrier.
I
Leonard Gumport, as Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”) for debtor Transcon Lines, a motor carrier, appeals the district court’s and bankruptcy court’s orders upholding the determinations of the' Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”),2 which rejected the Trustee’s claims under the Interstate Commerce Act (“ICA”), 49 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq., against six of Transcon’s former customers who were allegedly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,018, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5003, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8071 in Re Transcon Lines, Debtor. Leonard L. Gumport v. At & T Technologies, Inc., Leonard L. Gumport v. Acf Industries, Inc., Leonard L. Gumport v. A.O. Smith Corp., Leonard L. Gumport v. American Standard, Inc., Surface Transportation Board, 1 Defendant-Intervenor/appellee. Leonard L. Gumport v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Leonard L. Gumport, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Eastman Kodak Co., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996