Legal Opinion
Warren Telechron Co. v. Waltham Watch Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 27, 1936No. Nos. 3865-3868PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
The above entitled infringement suits were tried together under a stipulation that the evidence, so far as relevant, should be received upon all cases. Three letters patent of the United States are involved, namely, No. 1,283,434 (referred to hereafter as the Warren clock patent) ; No. 1,334,-423 (referred to hereafter as the Warren indicator patent); and No. 1,892,552 (referred to hereafter as the Holtz patent).
The reason for the four bills of complaint is that the parties plaintiff have subdivided the rights under the patents involved in different fields by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richardson v. FrazierDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022