Legal Opinion

Thomson, Bohrer, Werth & Razook v. MULTI REST. CONC., INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 1990No. 89-2455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

561 So.2d 1192 (1990)

THOMSON, BOHRER, WERTH & RAZOOK, a Florida General Partnership, and Parker D. Thomson, Sanford L. Bohrer, Susan B. Werth and Richard J. Razook, Petitioners,

v.

MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., and Jon W. Zeder, Respondents.

No. 89-2455.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 16, 1990.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1990.

Joseph P. Averill, Miami, for petitioners.

James E. Glass, Miami, for respondents.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.

2Per curiam

Thomson, Bohrer, Werth and Razook, a Florida general partnership, and the individual members of the said…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. City of Deerfield Beach v. VaillantSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Johnson v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. Conner v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Gw Devel. Corp. v. Village of No. Palm Beach Zb of A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kinko's, Inc. v. PayneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Pradas v. PradasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Canal Ins. Co. v. ReedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API