Legal Opinion
State v. McMichael
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 12, 1997No. Nos. 94-2502, 94-3060 to 94-3065, 94-3067 to 94-3072, 94-3079, 94-3123 to 94-3125, 94-3139, 94-3140, 94-3145, 94-3157, 94-3158, 94-3208, 94-3210, 94-3238 to 94-3241, 94-3244, 94-3251 to 94-3253, 94-3342, 94-3357, 94-3358, 94-3392, 94-3521, 94-3626, 94-3627, 95-0036 to 95-0039, 95-0062 to 95-0065, 95-0136, 95-0372, 95-0428 to 95-0430, 95-0470, 95-0485, 95-0501, 95-0514, 95-0656, 95-0658, 95-0724, 95-0887, 95-0958, 95-1085, 95-1101, 95-1102, 95-1522, 95-1550, 95-1709, 95-1733, 95-1810 to 95-1812, 95-1820, 95-1858, 95-1903, 95-2752 and 95-3521Published
1Per curiam
The above-styled cases are consolidated for the purpose of the issuance of this opinion.
We affirm on authority of State v. Dugan, 665 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA), dec. appr’d, 685 So.2d 1210 (Fla.1996).
DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DuganSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- State v. DuganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995