Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sepheus

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 21, 2012No. 11-P-160PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTrainor, J.

The Commonwealth charged the defendant, Carl Sepheus, with possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, G. L. c. 94C, § 32A(c). At the close of the Commonwealth’s case in a jury-waived trial, Sepheus filed a motion for a required finding of not guilty, which the judge denied. The defendant was convicted, and now argues in a timely appeal that the evidence was not sufficient to support a finding that he intended to distribute the three, separately wrapped rocks of “crack” cocaine that were found in his possession.

*766We conclude that there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable fact…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. CasaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. MontecalvoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. LaoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. SepheusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API