Legal Opinion

Lee v. Barnes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1963No. 36428PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This appeal has been brought challenging the criterion applied by the trial court in determining the upset price of certain mortgaged theater equipment. The hearing on this question was conducted in compliance with a remand by this court in Lee v. Barnes, 58 Wn. (2d) 265, 362 P. (2d) 237 (1961).

Peter Barnes and the corporations herein involved (appellants) purchased certain theater equipment and leased several motion picture theaters in the vicinity of central Washington which were owned by John Lee (respondent). Appellants executed chattel mortgages on the theater equipment to secure payment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lee v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank of Lockport v. Eagle Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Tacoma v. McCaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Farm Credit Bank v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Olathe Bank v. MannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API