Legal Opinion
Sana v. Hawaiian Cruises Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 1999No. 98-15077PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
Peter Sana appeals from the judgment in favor of Hawaiian Cruises, Ltd. on his claim for maintenance and cure. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
On January 5, 1995, Hawaiian Cruises hired Sana to work in the galley aboard the Navatek I, a vessel used for whale-watching cruises. He typically worked from 6:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on certain assigned days, and he could be called to work additional shifts on short notice.1 On March 9 and 10, 1995,. Sana worked a normal shift. He did not report any accident or illness, and his manager Jenny Curry observed nothing unusual about his appearance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. James J. PazsintCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Betty Jordan v. Kelly BinnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Ralph Pena-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Pfingston v. Ronan Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Kaleena MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.