Knox v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
When this case was here in 196 F.2d 112, Knox v. First Security Bank, we held the complaint with the attached 1909 contract and 1924 letter legally sufficient to show that by the 1924 letter A. C. Milner accepted and adopted the 1909 contract as president and on behalf of the Milner Corporation; and that his actual authority to do so was an issue for determination on the merits. As against the contention that the original contract was ultra vires for lack of consideration to the corporation, we thought the allegations to the effect that Knox suffered a detriment and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Knox v. First Security Bank of UtahCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Carlquist v. QuayleUtah Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tool Box, Inc. v. Ogden City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Cooper v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Cooper v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Bates v. Cottonwood Cove CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Bengar v. Clark Equipment Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.