Legal Opinion

Succession of Ducloslange

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1843PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Probates of New Orleans, Bermudez, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.

In this suit, which was one for a partition among the natural children of the late Philippe Ducloslange, of some real property bequeathed to them by ;their father, Levi Peirce who held a judicial mortgage recorded in November, 1837, against Edouard Ducloslange,-one of them, for $1818,50, and F. Buisson, as syndic of the creditors of said Edouard Ducloslange, who had failed in 1838, were ruled to show cause why the mortgage should not be cancelled and erased, so far as it bore upon the property sold to effect the partition, reserving all their rights to the amount coming to the insolvent from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arnaud v. TarbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Succession of FeitelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Succession of BlossomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Rice v. KeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. Succession of WardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Succession of BurgessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API