Legal Opinion
Adams v. Riker Operating Company, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the negative. Second question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.
• Concur: Lohghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmond and Thacher, JJ. Conway and Fuld, JJ., dissent upon the ground that the lease, both in its original form and as modified, provided for a rental “ in a graduated scale ” within the meaning Of Laws of 1945, chapter 314, section 13, as amended by Laws of 1946, chapter 273, and accordingly the lease provisions with regard to rent should control. Taking no part: Dye, J.
2Cited by5 opinions
- King Arthur Restaurant, Inc. v. London Terrace, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Seconset Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Seconset Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Seconset Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Seven Eleven Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. Dave Herstein Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947