Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. City of Chattanooga

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

■ Plaintiff’s declaration was held not to state a right or cause of action against the city, on demurrer, and he has appealed in error.

The suit is for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff avers that, while working on a city street, repairing a curb or surface drain, under the control and orders of the city, he was struck and injured by a piece of metal flying from a sledge hammer which was being used by another employee of the city engaged in the same or similar work; that this hammer was old and worn, was defective and dangerous to use, and was so known to be by the city. The furnishing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Conelly v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Saulman v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Barree v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Knoxville v. HartuTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Nashville v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  3. Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. CountsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Boyd Et Ux. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Russell v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API