Shepherd v. City of Chattanooga
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart
■ Plaintiff’s declaration was held not to state a right or cause of action against the city, on demurrer, and he has appealed in error.
The suit is for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff avers that, while working on a city street, repairing a curb or surface drain, under the control and orders of the city, he was struck and injured by a piece of metal flying from a sledge hammer which was being used by another employee of the city engaged in the same or similar work; that this hammer was old and worn, was defective and dangerous to use, and was so known to be by the city. The furnishing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Conelly v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Saulman v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Barree v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Knoxville v. HartuTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Nashville v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
- Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. CountsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Boyd Et Ux. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Russell v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.