Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Bank

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 4, 1976No. 1 CA-CIV 2931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

This appeal seeks an interpretation of the phrase “sales contracts or agreements” contained in A.R.S. § 2-153* which required that aircraft dealers file a bond “conditioned for the faithful performance of all sales contracts or agreements.” Aircraft dealer was defined in A.R.S. § 2-151*:

“1. ‘Aircraft dealer’ means any person engaged in the sale or brokerage of any new or used aircraft, or a commercial flight operator or fixed based operator who is engaged in the sale or brokerage of new or used aircraft and has an established place of business.”

The issue arose when the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Employment Security Commission of Arizona v. FishArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Isley v. School District No. 2 of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Estate of StarkArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dewitt v. Magma Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ariz. Civil Rights Div. v. Hughes Air Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Arizona Civil Rights Division, Department of Law v. Hughes Air Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API