Legal Opinion

Hill v. Whiteside

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1912No. Appeal, No. 193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 193, Jan. T., 1912, by W. C. Whiteside, guardian of John T. Hill, a weak-minded person, from order of C. P. Lancaster County, Trust Book No. 18, p. 322, making rule for removal absolute in case of John T. Hill by his next friend, the Lancaster Trust Company, v. William C. Whiteside, guardian. Petition for removal of guardian.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 193, Jan. T., 1912, by W. C. Whiteside, guardian of John T. Hill, a weak-minded person, from order of C. P. Lancaster County, Trust Book No. 18, p. 322, making rule for removal absolute in case of John T. Hill by his next friend, the Lancaster Trust Company, v. William C. Whiteside, guardian. Petition for removal of guardian. Landis, P. J., filed the following opinion: In this case, the petition of John T. Hill sets forth that, on January 20, 1902, William C. Whiteside was appointed his guardian as a weak-minded person; that the said guardian has never filed an inventory; that he…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The order appealed from is affirmed at the cost of the appellant, on the opinion of the learned President Judge of the Common Pleas.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Voshake's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Henry's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Tiffany's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Susquehanna County · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API