Legal Opinion

Maxon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1974No. 48212PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL J. CORNELIUS, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of heroin and assessed punishment of ten years’ confinement. Two grounds for reversal are urged. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

Ground No. 1 contends that prejudicial error was committed when Officer Jim Murray was allowed, over appellant’s objection, to testify as follows:

“Q I am going to direct your attention to the 29th day of August of 1972, and ask you if you had occasion on that day to go to the vicinity of 1403 Blalock?
“A Yes sir, I did.
“Q All right sir, can you tell me what…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Rosales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Ex Parte FloresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Perez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Olivas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1982
  3. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  4. Soliz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API