United States v. Morales-Rosales
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAVID FOLSOM, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 23, 2010, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence be granted.
On March 1, 2010, the Government filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report. The Government…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Benito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. OrozcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Rangel-PortilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Canales-RosalesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014